Tuesday, November 8, 2016

270?

'Bigger than Brexit':

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Brace for Results From Battleground

First Races Called in Bitter Contest Marked by Voter Doubts

Toblerone triangle change upsets fans

Cartoon


US Election Results 2016

Here's a Map of the Problems at the Polls So Far

The 2016 Presidential Election Live Blog and Analysis

Australia’s oldest prehistoric sites

She’s one of the new faces of CoverGirl. And she’s wearing a hijab.

‘Black witch priest’ in India dismembers 4-year-old in sacrifice to find teen’s missing cellphone

Ralph Cicerone, Scientist Who Sounded Climate Change Alarm, Dies at 73

The Party That Wants to Make Poland Great Again

Neutralizing human antibodies prevent Zika virus replication and fetal disease in mice

Beyond Reading Gaol

Shame on Us, the American Media

Shame on Us, the American Media | New Republic
Money is not the answer to protect the election system.

Rurik Jutting guilty of murder of two Indonesian women in Hong Kong

Latino Voters Show Trump What It Means to Be American

Hungary’s Lawmakers Reject Plan to Block Resettlement of Refugees

Let’s Not Do This Again

Let’s Not Do This Again - The New York Times
He is face the  conservative veto  power -  the things that conservatives want are generally  retrograde.  and that means that stupid people want smart people to implement extremely stupid things.  now that is all right terms of money -  why not take the money that they are offering.  But some of the issues that they want eventually become unsustainably difficult to maintain.  That,  in a nutshell,  is the problem with a conservative government:  eventually,  the buy offs  that the Populace wants are to expensive.  For example elite conservatives do not really mind  interracial marriage -  look at,  closely,  who the conservatives shack up with -  but they are willing to give the stupid populace that,  if they can continue to loot the public pockets.

But conservatism ends with a truly large mess,  and the moderates will only delay for 10 to 15 years. The question is does Hillary want to go down with the ship,  and leave a complete mess.  Because eventually the liberals will take charge,  because they represent the people who are disadvantaged. Remember,  the baby boom cannot have everything it wants - it is logically impossible for everyone to get out of the stock market,  or the housing market,  or whatever place they have stashed their money.

A More Dysfunctional Congress

Now vote, damn you

Because the low information voters are easy to turn out.